Tax Analysts Blog

A Bad Law Addressing a Bad Business Tax

Posted on Jun 25, 2014

North Carolina has eliminated a very bad tax in a very bad way. Gov. Pat McCrory (R) signed HB 1050 to revoke municipalities' authority to tax businesses beginning in 2015. North Carolina did a good thing by eliminating a terrible tax. But it also curtailed local government taxing authority, which is rarely, if ever, good policy.

Local option business taxes, whether imposed on income, gross receipts, or personal property, are terrible ways to raise revenue. Only 14 states authorize their use, and they raise a paltry sum compared with the property tax or even local option sales and income taxes. Virtually all the public finance experts who have studied the issue denounce their use. Local business taxes stifle economic growth. As a result, they heighten competition among jurisdictions. That competition in turn causes local governments to offer incentives to attract or retain business, and those incentives are rife with political favoritism. Taxing business at the local level is inefficient and ineffective. So North Carolina eliminating those taxes is good in that regard.


But the measure places limits on local government taxing authority, and limits on that authority are limits on political autonomy. I'm a fervent supporter of localism because I believe strong, autonomous local government is a normative good. Local governments are more economically efficient and more democratically responsive than state or federal governments.


We should be wary of any attempt to weaken local autonomy, and limiting taxing authority does just that. Historically, tax limitations have resulted in more centralized financing of local services. State bureaucracies can't efficiently finance and govern local matters. Opponents of the North Carolina proposal noted that it would cause localities to rely more heavily on property taxes. That's a good thing. There is no better way to fund local government services than through property taxes. But as we have seen time and time again, states are willing to limit property taxes as well.


Local option business taxes are inefficient and generally lousy ways to pay for government, but local governments should be free to decide whether to use them. In the end, most will choose not to.

This is an excerpt of an article that first ran in State Tax Notes magazine

Read Comments (2)

emsig beobachterJun 24, 2014

David: Local option business taxes are less efficient than what tax? What is
the base of the NC local option tax? To what use(s) are the revenues derived
from the local options tax put? What would replace the revenue -- property tax
increases; expenditure cuts? Property taxes, sales taxes, and income taxes
impose "deadweight" efficiency losses as do the local options tax.

State governments are more efficient than local governments for financing large
scale capital projects, redistribution of income (your bugaboo), correcting
intrastate negative externalities, and some other functions.

One should not make blanket statements regarding economic efficiency,
neutrality, etc. Public finance is much more nuanced than that.

I realize a blog post is not the proper forum for a reasoned, but passionate
debate of complicated issues. However, you perform a great service by airing
these important and complex issues. Keep up the good work!

david brunoriJun 25, 2014

Emsig, Local option business taxes are terrible! Far worse than any other local
levy (although local option sales and income taxes aren't great either). The
only good sources of local revenue are property taxes and user fees. I don't
think there is anything nuanced about it!

I agree with you regarding state funding of capital projects and
redistribution.

I do appreciate you writing. You are obviously in the business.

Submit comment

Tax Analysts reserves the right to approve or reject any comments received here. Only comments of a substantive nature will be posted online.

By submitting this form, you accept our privacy policy.

* REQUIRED FIELD

All views expressed on these blogs are those of their individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Tax Analysts. Further, Tax Analysts makes no representation concerning the views expressed and does not guarantee the source, originality, accuracy, completeness or reliability of any statement, fact, information, data, finding, interpretation, or opinion presented. Tax Analysts particularly makes no representation concerning anything found on external links connected to this site.