Tax Analysts Blog

Congress Should Abolish All Tax Breaks for Higher Education

Posted on Jun 13, 2014

College is hopelessly unaffordable. Only the very wealthy can manage to pay full freight at high-prestige private universities, and even less exalted institutions bleed their students dry. Sure, financial aid provides some help. But the bottom-line cost is still extraordinary, leaving many students and their families mired in debt.

Just this week, President Obama underscored the heavy burden of all this borrowing and called for additional college aid. “We are here today,” he said, “because we believe that in America, no hard-working young person should be priced out of a higher education."

Despite its cost, though, college is still a good deal. According to one recent study, not going to college will cost you dearly – on the order of half a million dollars. “That’s right,” wrote David Leonhardt of The New York Times. “Over the long run, college is cheaper than free.”

But long-run value doesn’t help with short-run tuition payments. Aware of this problem, political leaders have tried to help, creating a variety of grant and loan programs to make college more affordable. And since the 1990s, they’ve used the tax code, too.

As the Center for American Progress recently observed:

      The United States tax code is full of provisions designed to encourage or reward specific behaviors, such as owning a home or saving for retirement. Tax benefits for higher education are no exception: Contributions to some college savings accounts grow tax-free, college tuition is often tax deductible, and some student-loan borrowers are able to deduct the interest paid on their student loans just as they would the interest paid on their mortgage.
This sounds great. So why is college still out of reach for so many students?

Partly because those tax breaks don’t work very well. As a group, they are poorly targeted and needlessly complex. Many deliver benefits to students who would attend college even without tax assistance – yet they still fail to provide adequate help for those in real need.

“There are multiple downsides to using the tax system as a way to help students pay for their postsecondary education,” concluded Tatyana Guzman in a recent article for Tax Notes.
      Tax-based aid creates a steep price tag for some educational preferences, while challenges remain with the timeliness of its delivery and low-income students' familiarity with it. Its regressivity, poor targeting, and incidence pose problems. Finally, educational tax provisions complicate the federal income tax system and make it less transparent.

That complexity is something to behold. There are at least 12 tax preferences targeting higher education, Guzman notes. Many are complex in their own right. When combined, however, they became a hopeless nightmare of complexity.

“Higher education tax provisions should be transparent and understandable,” wrote the Government Accountability Office in a typically understated report. “The multiple higher education tax expenditures available to help offset current education expenses fall short of this principle.“

The Center for American Progress was more direct. Existing tax incentives, it charged, “needlessly confuse families and complicate the tax system.”

In the big budgetary picture, education tax breaks are not especially expensive. According to one estimate, they account for only about $30 billion of the $1 trillion tax expenditure budget. But in a tight fiscal environment, they still seem pricey, leading some critics to suggest refinement, reduction, and reform.

I have a better idea: Let’s get rid of tax incentives for education entirely. Generally speaking, they are Rube Goldberg contraptions, best replaced by something more straightforward – like direct spending programs.

If Congress wants kids to go to college, it should just give them money. It would be cheaper and more efficient, not to mention a lot more transparent. Analysts at the Treasury Department have been making this point for decades. Or at least they were until various presidents put them to work designing new tax incentives.

Those presidents, of course, understood the central virtue of education tax incentives: In the political arena, they count as tax cuts, not spending hikes. Which is ridiculous when you consider the bottom line -- but not so ridiculous when you consider the politics.

Still, tax incentives are a bad way to deliver education assistance. We’d all be better off if politicians would just make the case for helping kids go to college -- and give them money to make it possible.

Read Comments (2)

edmund dantesJun 12, 2014

All that the education tax incentives accomplished was allowing tuition to keep
growing faster than inflation. Tax incentives that are theoretically aimed at
a buyer always inure to the benefit of the seller, in the form of a price
higher than could otherwise be charged, whether we're talking education or
buying homes. So, I completely agree with your suggestion that we eliminate
entirely the tax "breaks" for higher education.

And while we're at it, I'd eliminate a break that is not targeted at education
but is exploited to the tune of billions of dollars annually by the most elite
universities. That is the exemption from tax for the investment earnings of
endowments. That public subsidy might be defensible for smaller endowments,
say up to $100 million. But for the $20 to $30 billion endowments of the Ivies
to be tax free is obscene.

David BrunoriJun 12, 2014

Joe, Terrific post. Abolish all education tax incentives. It would result in
better tax policy -- and better higher ed policy.

Submit comment

Tax Analysts reserves the right to approve or reject any comments received here. Only comments of a substantive nature will be posted online.

By submitting this form, you accept our privacy policy.


All views expressed on these blogs are those of their individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Tax Analysts. Further, Tax Analysts makes no representation concerning the views expressed and does not guarantee the source, originality, accuracy, completeness or reliability of any statement, fact, information, data, finding, interpretation, or opinion presented. Tax Analysts particularly makes no representation concerning anything found on external links connected to this site.