Tax Analysts Blog

Brownback Can’t Catch a Break

Posted on Jun 10, 2015

Liberals take great pleasure in bashing Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback (R). They call him nasty names on social media. I have never believed name-calling was a particularly effective debate tool. Yet, the age of electronic communication seems to have turned everyone into an 8-year-old. And Brownback, more than any other politician, has borne the brunt of the tiresome trend of substituting personal attacks for reasoned policy debate.

Beyond the juvenile attacks, Brownback has been skewered by organizations I admire a lot. The Tax Foundation has been harsh in its criticism. The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, not surprisingly, has been harsher. At least the foundation and institute are advancing ideas in their critiques. The odd thing about the Kansas debate is that Brownback was vilified when he cut taxes. He was then vilified when he proposed raising taxes. He was accused of making the system more regressive. But he was given no credit for proposing to remove the poorest folks in Kansas from the tax rolls.

I think Brownback had the right idea and the wrong approach. He wanted to reduce tax burdens on Kansas citizens. That is laudable for two reasons. First, in the long run, lower taxes will lead to greater economic growth. Second, the money belongs to Kansans. Politicians don't have an inherent right to people's property. And it doesn't matter whether lawmakers' motivations are noble or venal -- it's not their money.

But I think Brownback made a terrible error when he exempted from tax all income from passthrough entities. If you are a partner in a Kansas law firm, your profits are tax free. If you are an associate or administrative assistant working for that partner, your salary is taxable. There is nothing right or just about that. Treating those sources of income differently is bad tax policy. The big effect of the exemption was to create more passthrough entities.

Moreover, the exemption for passthroughs is what blew a giant hole in the budget. The state's finances would have been fine had Brownback stuck with his income tax cuts. But they couldn't survive the passthrough exemption.

Brownback has now recognized his mistake, although I doubt he will admit it publicly. His admission comes in the form of a May 30 tax increase proposal. While I'm as antitax as anyone who makes his or her living in the tax business, sometimes you need more tax revenue. And in Kansas, that's now.

Brownback is not dialing back the exemption for passthrough income as he should. Instead, he has proposed to increase the sales tax rate from 6.15 percent to 6.65 percent, increase the cigarette tax by 50 cents a pack, and eliminate just about every income tax deduction. He would keep the charitable deduction and allow a 50 percent deduction on home mortgage interest and property payments. Most telling is his proposal to remove 388,000 low-income Kansans from the tax rolls.

Are these good ideas? The sales and cigarette tax increases will add to the regressivity of the system. Most economists (including a lot of liberal economists) like consumption taxes. But creating a more regressive system is not good. It certainly won't endear the governor to his liberal detractors -- more name-calling is sure to be on the way. But Brownback is proposing to eliminate a lot of income tax deductions. Any way you look at it, eliminating deductions is a good idea. And the governor is proposing to remove many poor people from the tax rolls. You would think liberals would applaud that, but I suspect they won't. Reducing the income tax burden will likely offset the modest sales tax increase, with respect to the overall effect on regressivity. Overall, the governor's ideas are pretty good.

I think Kansas should repeal the exemption for passthrough entities. There is no economic or tax reason for exempting income earned through an LLC or a partnership. In fact, exempting such income is contrary to the accepted principles of sound tax policy. But at least the governor and the GOP in the legislature are recognizing that the tax cutting went too far.

This post is an excerpt of an article that appeared in State Tax Notes.

Read Comments (4)

Sko HayesJun 9, 2015

The state of Kansas cannot afford Brownback's "proposal" to remove a third of
the population from the tax rolls, no matter how little they pay.
While you were listing the taxes the legislature is imposing, you forgot taxing
non-profit hospitals, organizations like Meals on Wheels and also takes away
the food tax rebate for the poor and elderly. Thank goodness I live near a
border and can shop in another state rather than pay the ransom
for these tax cuts Brownback refuses to touch.

David Carrington Jr.Jun 9, 2015

"But at least the governor and the GOP in the legislature are recognizing that
the tax cutting went too far."

Did they? Or did they just do exactly what they wanted: provide a massive
exemption to (primarily) the wealthy, and impose regressive tax increases to
(partially) pay for it? Nothing about Brownback suggests to me that this was by
accident.

david brunoriJun 9, 2015

David Carrington, I think a valid criticism is that Brownback is pushing
regressive taxes (rather than repealing the awful exemption for pass through
entities). Still, the fact that they are going to raise any taxes is an
admission that the cuts went too far.

CharlesJun 17, 2015

I constantly hear about Brownback and his low-tax, moderate-spending state's
$0.6M budget shortfall and hear very little about O'Malley and how he left his
high-tax, high-spending, high-borrowing state of Maryland with a $1.2M budget
shortfall.

Submit comment

Tax Analysts reserves the right to approve or reject any comments received here. Only comments of a substantive nature will be posted online.

By submitting this form, you accept our privacy policy.

* REQUIRED FIELD

All views expressed on these blogs are those of their individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Tax Analysts. Further, Tax Analysts makes no representation concerning the views expressed and does not guarantee the source, originality, accuracy, completeness or reliability of any statement, fact, information, data, finding, interpretation, or opinion presented. Tax Analysts particularly makes no representation concerning anything found on external links connected to this site.