Tax Analysts Blog

Showdown in Kansas: Realtors vs. Governor

Posted on Mar 11, 2013

"In case there is any doubt I want you to know we will preserve the part of the American dream which the home mortgage interest symbolizes."
-President Ronald Reagan to realtors, 1984

Founded in 1872 on the Santa Fe Trail and the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad, Dodge City--"the Cowboy Capital"--has a colorful history. Buffalo hunters--known as "stinkers"--shipped 1.5 million hides by 1878. Next came 5 million head of cattle driven out of the southwest on famous cattle trails. With all that quick money being made, the town quickly gained a reputation for lawlessness. Lots of hard liquor, "soiled doves," and gunfights in the streets. Lawmen like Wyatt Earp tried to preserve order.

In modern Dodge City local businesses try to profit from the city's historic past. But in 2012 Kansas Governor Sam Brownback wanted to lower the states income tax rate, and repeal of the state's historic preservation tax credit was one his proposals to pay for the cost. Dodge city businesses did not like it and real estate developers across the state protested. In the end Brownback got his reform but the credit was preserved.

In 2013 Governor Brownback has set his sights on repealing the mortgage interest deduction. He needs more revenue to keep his signature income tax rate cuts from ruining state finances. In an obvious effort to test the waters for national office, Governor Brownback is taking his tax reform message nationwide. Needless to say, real estate agents in Kansas are vowing a tough fight to preserve the deduction.

The Kansas tax reform fight is of national importance. Brownback's efforts are a bellwether for federal tax reform. If the governor can't cut the mortgage interest deduction in a heavily Republican state, it does not bode well for bold federal tax reform plans that are depending on trimming the federal mortgage interest deduction to pay for lower rates.

I believe my views are consistent with those of most economists when I express my hope that Brownback succeeds. Although the mortgage interest deduction is the tax break politicians and the public are most protective of, it is probably the least defensible on policy grounds. The housing lobby says the deduction promotes homeownership and that is good for neighborhoods and families. Of all the convoluted excuses for tax breaks, this is one of the weakest I've ever come across.

The reality is the United States has too many homes and many of them are too large. This draws capital and resources away from productive sectors of the economy. Sure, while the housing sector is still in recovery, we don't want to add to its problems. So why not provide an incentive to buy houses now by announcing that homes purchased after 2014 will get a 5 percent haircut on their mortgage interest deduction? Then cut 5 percent per year until the deduction is eliminated for homes purchased after 2034. The United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia have no mortgage interest deduction, and their homeownership rates are just fine.

Read Comments (1)

vivian darkbloomMar 12, 2013

Absolutely the right policy, but this sounds like political suicide.

On the other hand, the article linked to stated this:

"About 315,000 Kansans — about 22 percent of all tax filers — deduct the
interest paid on their home mortgages when they file their taxes. The deduction
has averaged about $390.49, costing the state $162 million."

The 22 percent seems plausible; but the rest of the math is very suspect!

Brownback should carefully study Obama's strategy on taxes even though pitting
78 percent against 22 percent is not nearly as favorable as 98 percent
against 2 percent. But, there's that nasty real estate broker lobby. It's
likely that eliminating the mortgage interest deduction will have to wait until
such time as the internet makes them obsolete.

And, forget about the economic arguments. Nobody is even listening.

Submit comment

Tax Analysts reserves the right to approve or reject any comments received here. Only comments of a substantive nature will be posted online.


This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

By submitting this form, you accept our privacy policy.


All views expressed on these blogs are those of their individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Tax Analysts. Further, Tax Analysts makes no representation concerning the views expressed and does not guarantee the source, originality, accuracy, completeness or reliability of any statement, fact, information, data, finding, interpretation, or opinion presented. Tax Analysts particularly makes no representation concerning anything found on external links connected to this site.